Art photographer and press photographer, they give express and some message by photo. They give a story and take a photo and make a record of the history. The photo tells how the society which it shows every state of fashion. The photo is mirror to reproduce the society. However, the press photography shows more reality than the art photography. If people want to be good art photographer, they need more creative thinking,but press photographer is not. The art photography do not need rule, it just need more creative photo than the press photography. The art photographers are just free to show what they are thinking and showing. Nevertheless, the press photographers send fact to readers. It is not able to deliver wrong facts, information or subjective view to readers, because they can make big problem in society.
Rodrigo Abd, Argentina, The Associated Pres
10 March 2012, Idib, Syria
Indian photographer Arko Datta
The art photography show that creative photo by art photographers. They do not need rule of taking photo, just more pretty and free than press photography.
International street photographer Beautiful Global photography
2. Is it ethical and acceptable to alter art photographs? Why? Why not?
The art photography is just free to taking photos. It means that they just show creative and how people see nature or person more pretty. They do not give message to viewer.
Therefore, it is not ethical and acceptable to alter art photographs.
3. Is it ethical and acceptable to alter press photographs? Why? Why not?
The press photographs make issue ethically, and they should not be acceptable. They show what happen in the world, and they give what this press photographs say by a photo. For example, war, sports such as the Olympic and environment. Therefore, when press photographers take photo, they should show honestly and should not give wrong message from photo.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기